Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets
نویسنده
چکیده
Consider a durable goods producer that has the option of monopolizing an aftermarket such as repair for its own product. An important question is whether such monopolization reduces welfare? We show that the anwer to this question is frequently no. In particular, we explore three models that illustrate various ways in which aftermarket monopolization can reduce inefficiencies and thus increase social welfare and frequently also consumer welfare. Our paper shows that efficiency enhancing aftermarket monopolization may be much more common than previous literature suggests.
منابع مشابه
Analyzing Welfare in Related Markets: Durable Goods and Aftermarkets
The "aftermarkets" literature focuses on two important questions: (1) do durable goods manufacturers that control their aftermarkets have an incentive to charge service prices that exceed costs?; (2) how significant (in a welfare sense) is this distortion? Unlike previous work, this paper addresses the latter question by explicitly modeling firm behavior under various market structure condition...
متن کاملThe Inkjet Aftermarket: An Economic Analysis
Replacement ink is available in aftermarkets defined by the products compatible with particular inkjet printers. Aftermarket theory establishes that consumers can be harmed by high prices in these aftermarkets, even if there is some degree of competition in the printer market. Survey evidence shows that consumers have little knowledge of replacement ink prices when they purchase printers. As a ...
متن کاملPatents and Antitrust: Application to Adjacent Markets
We examine the intersection of patents and antitrust where a patent holder uses the monopoly power it possesses in the market for a patented product to exclude competitors in an adjacent market and attempt to monopolize or monopolize the adjacent market. The present scheme for awarding patents cannot judge when the issuance of a patent will lead to the appropriate balance between innovation and...
متن کاملTwo Theories of Monopoly and Competition: Implications and Applications
This paper addresses the claim that monopolies arise naturally out of the free market. I show by comparing and contrasting two theories of monopoly—economic and political monopoly—that this is not true. This paper also demonstrates that the two theories of monopoly have their separate roots in two opposite theories of competition: perfect competition and competition as rivalry. I show that only...
متن کاملCentralized Supply Chain Network Ddesign: Monopoly, Duopoly, and Ooligopoly Competitions under Uncertainty
This paper presents a competitive supply chain network design problem in which one, two, or three supply chains are planning to enter the price-dependent markets simultaneously in uncertain environments and decide to set the prices and shape their networks. The chains produce competitive products either identical or highly substitutable. Fuzzy multi-level mixed integer programming is used to mo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009